Sunday, April 26, 2009

Oh, Manifesto.

Dear Readers (or just George. If he even stills reads this...),

As we near the end of Spring Semester, I regret to inform you that The New Small Talk has failed on its promise to replace newspapers. Perhaps that was a ridiculous promise to begin with (as was most of the original manifesto), and I hope no one was stupid enough to believe it. I have composed a list of contributors to the failure of this blog:

1. Lack of dedication -- daily updates are in fact daily. I have somewhat of a life.

2. Copyright laws -- they're a bit scary. I became afraid to steal images. I considered drawing my own in MS Paint, but I'm no artist. And I couldn't paparazzi any photos... celebs just don't come to Manassas all that often anymore.

3. Jessica Simpson -- because really, can't everything be blamed on her?

4. For the Love of Ray Jay -- I may have never made a post about it, but wasn't that just the breakout television series of the year? Danger, she smashed the homies. Anyway, perhaps I spent too much time watching that instead of writing about it.

5. The superficial is just better -- thesuperficial.com

6. Dina Lohan fell off the map. Where has this psycho been lately? It was hard to make fun of crazy moms when her and Lynne Spears went MIA.

7. Jessica Simpson -- when isn't she a hot mess? Doesn't that make the Hot Mess of the Week award useless? 

I could go on forever, but what is the point? No matter the reason, The New Small Talk has failed its readers. I set out to make celebrities more tolerable, and doesn't it seem like Paris Hilton has only become more annoying since I started this blog? 

We certainly didn't swiffer the nation. Our 1 person following isn't very impressive. 

However, I seem to recall that the writer of the manifesto is supposed to make outrageous claims that they later disown. So, I would like to take the opportunity to disown my manifesto. From now on, I promise nothing. That way, if I decide to post something, it will be magical and completely going above and beyond what my manifesto calls for. My posts will be so infrequent that seeing a unicorn will be more likely to happen.

George,
We gave it a good run. And it was fun while it lasted. But I think this Blogger relationship should end here. You could check back from time to time, but like I stated before, I'm not making any promises that I will even still be here. Sorry.

All the best!
KP





Monday, April 20, 2009

Group Project Critique

The group project that I was most impressed by was Facade by Justin and Shane. Their site had a great layout and was overall very well done. It seems like a lot of work went into creating their project.

What I like most about their site, and didn't even realize until just now, is that every time you go to the intro page the image changes slightly. I have no clue how they even managed to do that, but it is a really neat effect.

I also liked the type-writer idea that was used on the second page, but it does make the text very difficult to read. Perhaps it would be easier to read if the type-writer motion was slower. Making it slower would allow for the viewer to have time to read the text, and it would also make that page easier to look at; the constant motion hurt my eyes a little.

The insurgent page was executed very well. Again, this is another technique that I have no clue how to do, but it is really interesting. I especially liked that they didn't just use this technique just to use it, but they made using the technique relevant by relating to the first line of the text. At first I thought random parts of the text "explode" and then reappear, but upon playing with their site, I realize that only the text that I hover over with the cursor are affected. I like that the user has control over this page in a sense, and the effect isn't just a code that "explodes" words in a set order.

The page entitled "Woman" also showcases another great effect. I like how letters drop down from the phrase before to create a new phrase. It seems like writing this would have taken a lot of thought. I think this page, more than the others, really shows the writing ability that Justin or Shane has. Writing these lines would have been challenging for me with the use of the entire alphabet, I couldn't imagine writing with a limited use of letters.

The Terrorist page moved really quickly and I was too impatient to actually take the time to read all of the writing. This works though. Slowing it down probably would have looked boring. I like the text being fast because it gives the page a sense of chaos and disorder. When I see the word terrorist, I sort of expect things to be chaotic and all over the place. Having the page slow and plain wouldn't have made any sense. I also liked how each text moved at a different pace and in different directions.

The Conspiracy Theorist page is crazy... for lack of a better word. The line "the most dangerous thing about chaos is the illusion of order" gives meaning to the rest of their project, and really kind of creeps me out. The rest of the project is about chaos, and yet it does have an order to it: certain words explode when you touch them, certain letters fall. Perhaps the words exploding is an illusion of order because there really is no set order to that; it is user-controlled. The other pages do seem to be a definite set order though and just give an illusion of chaos. I like how there are boxes on this page that teh user can move to cover the text and reveal the pictures, but I am not sure what the purpose of this effect is.

The next page, entitled "Mother" bothers me. It starts out with really creepy images and then uses an image of Legos in court. There is also an image of a judge in a wig who just looks goofy. I wish this page would have just used serious and eery pictures, instead of mixing in two pictures that disrupt the flow. The images may relate to the text below them, but they don't fit in with the res tof the images. I like Legos as much as anyone else and that picture does make me laugh, but it really takes away from the tone that the rest of the page works to establish.

The Deceased page was my favorite. The images and text were very well chosen and a lot of thought seems to have gone into this page. I like the effect that is used to reveal the pictures too. This is much more interesting that just having each picture clearly displayed on the page. I like how the pictures overlap in a box and then reveal themselves once the cursor is on an image. I also think it was very creative to use an image of a dead fly alongside a caption that begins with "death kept flying"...clever!

The Machine page is funny. I love the "to do" section. This page is a good ending for this project. Although, I was able to view the images and it was not between 8:08 and 8:10, and it definitely wasn't a Tuesday.

Overall this project is very interesting and well put together. There were only a few things that I did not like, but the good definitely outweighs the bad. Shane and Justin seem to have put a lot of work into this project. Their site was easy and fun to navigate.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

The best day ever!

I am ever so happy to report that Jessica Simpson has finally been dropped from her country label. When she first started this whole thing I warned her, "No one likes you. We all like Carrie Underwood so much more. Don't even try. We're all going to laugh at you." 

Seriously though, she said crap about Carrie Underwood (THE ACM ENTERTAINER OF THE YEAR!) and expected to create a successful country music career. Are you an idiot? ... Yes. But stop using that as an excuse.




Monday, April 6, 2009

Critique Three

Juked is an online literary journal that publishes fiction, poetry, and photograpghy; however, there was little photography to be found on the site. Juked has been in publication since 1999, and says that they don't "adhere to any particular themes or tastes." This literary journal is updated two to three times a week, and there is also an annual print edition.

I was most surprised to learn that contributors to this literary journal have been anthologized in W.W. Norton's New Sudden Fiction and Dzanc Book's Best of the Web. I was immediately drawn to this literary journal because the icon didn't seem very scholarly. I wanted to review a journal that didn't immediately strike me as boring.

The publications on Juked are full of talent, and it seems like this is an effective platform for creative work, since many of the contributors have been recognized. My only complaint is that none of these works take advantage of the digital format. This journal might as well be in print. The only reason it is on the web is probably because print costs more money, and because they do so many updates. The publications almost look like a page from a book. They are very plain and the text is standard. I suppose this is because the contributors aren't just aspiring to be published online, and want their work to translate into print easily. I enjoyed the online works from my first critique much more. I guess I just feel that if something is published online, then there should be links and hovers...or anything to add excitement to the text. There are so many things that can be done to digital formats, and I just feel like Juked didn't do anything.

The thing I liked msot about Juked is that they state in their info "your work will always remain yours." Until this class, I didn't think about rights. If I ever actually wrote something... and someone actually wanted to publish it, then I would want the rights to my own work. Juked asks for first-and-one-time and archival rights. That sounds like a fair deal to me. However, the chances of me writing something that Juked would even consider publishing is slim to none. The works in this journal are very refined, and I have never written anything. Ever. Unless Juked does an issue about literary analysis papers, I am pretty sure I will never be featured on this site. But, if the oppurtunity ever presented itself, I would want to be published on this site.

Overall, Juked had great work on their site, but I would have liked to see more photography and more use of digital formats.

Group

I am in a group with George and Jonathan. We're no New Kids On the Block, but we're still pretty cool. Maybe more like Hanson than anything.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Critique of the ReRemixx

I was most impressed with George Shry's remix, or ReRemixx. I am terrible at any computer editing program, and I think his project really showcased how skilled he is with Photoshop. The point of this assignment wasn't to show everyone how talented you are, but I think being skilled with certain computer programs definitely makes your project more appealing. I thought George also did a great job at incorporating other lessons from class into his project. For instance, he contacted an artist for permission to use one of the drawings. I sat on Creative Commons for an eternity searching for works I could alter without having permission to do so. Maybe had I just contacted users on Flickr, I could have used the images I originally wanted to use. Good thinking, George.

I also liked how George's project seemed very seamless, or if it hadn't even been remixed. I guess this is also another example of how skilled he is at Photoshop. Most of the projects screamed "I've been remixed!," but George's seemed like it was in it's original format. He actually mentioned that he added the text because the image seemed like he didn't really alter it in any way. I think that is a sign of great work. If it is impossible to tell that things were added and altered, then it probably took a long time to create this image. It seems like George spent a great deal of time creating this image.

The main thing I liked about George's project is that he used different mediums to create the image we now see. The main dragon was a pencil sketch, the crystal ball is a digital work, and the fingers holding the crystal ball are George's, taken with a digital camera. Combining three different types of images to make one image must have been challenging. It is a very creative idea, that worked out very well. 

The quotes that George used are very applicable to this project. This project was very driven by imagination. Without that, none of us could have come up with our sources to remix. And, it seems as though George certainly did use a lot of imagination in producing this project.

Overall, I feel that George achieved his goal of making his remix project "seamless". And, although he expressed concerns that his hours of labor that went into the project may be lost because of the seamless effect,  I think most of us were aware that this was a tedious and time consuming remix project. 

I wouldn't change anything about this remix project, because if I did it would be entirely noticeable and only serve to mess up all of the work that George put into creating this. I would like to steal all of George's techniques and learn how to use Photoshop. 

Sunday, March 15, 2009

The Remix

Remix Project: Alice's (in)famous Adventure's in Wonderland


(click on images to enlarge!)

















For my Remix Project, I decided to mix Lewis Caroll's, Alice's Adventure's in Wonderland, with images of celebrities. At the beginning of this class I made a celebrity blog, and decided this direction for the Remix Project would be appropriate to make my assignments cohesive. I originally planned to use the illustrations from Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, but later thought of celebrities who could be used in place of Lewis Caroll's characters. In place of Alice, I decided to use Alice Cooper (mainly because the only other Alice I could think of was the maid from the Brady Bunch). Elvis is of course the King (just beating out the Burger King for the role), and the Queen was also an obvious choice. The White Rabbit is a Playboy Bunny, whose name I am not sure of. Finally, the Mad Hatter is T-Pain, who often wears hats that always make me think of the story. I obtained all of these images from Creative Commons. The borders and text that were added to the images were obtained from archive.org.

The first thing I did was edit the images in Comic Life. This allowed me to alter the images into an acrylic comic. I then realized that I am a self-proclaimed Mac user, but I felt helpless without Microsoft Paint. So, I saved everything to a flashdrive and attempted to use the only PC in the house -- a beauty from forever ago that still has a floppy disk drive. To my dismay, someone had removed MS Paint. I was forced to google how to retrieve this amazing application, and after hours of searching was successfully up and doodling in my beloved MS Paint. I opened two windows of MS Paint, one of my acrylic comic images and one of the pages from the book. I resized the images to 80% of their original size and then began with the magic of copy and paste. I copied the borders from the actual pages of the book and pasted them around the images of the celebrities. I then began to copy the quotes from the book; breaking down the words and playing with the constituents. However, I thought it was important to not mix the words up, because I still wanted the quotes to be easily read. After doing this for each picture, I saved them to my flashdrive and uploaded them on The New Small Talk. I decided to post these to my blog because successfully incorporated celebrities into this assignment. Had I not used celebrities, then I would have posted this project separate from my blog.

This project was challenging for someone who has no editing skills other than what she learned in elementary school on MS Paint. My main goal was to create an end product that wasn't horrible, and also to create one that was semi-clever. My purpose was to combine two things that bring joy to my life: 1. Disney Movies, 2. Celebrity Gossip. Since Disney is crazy, I decided to not get sued and use Lewis Caroll's work instead. This assignment also gave me a chance to read Alice's Adventure's in Wonderland again, and I was also able to watch the movie... passing it off as "investigative work" for a project. Overall, I am pleased with the end results, but wish I could have thought of someone to be the Cheshire Cat.

Image sources:
Bunny: http://www.flickr.com/photos/synthesizers/1650281422/
Elvis: http://www.flickr.com/photos/e06158/2648766400/
T-Pain: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ethanhein/3039211994/
Alice Cooper: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kylemacdonald/147436334/
Queen: http://www.flickr.com/photos/13790198@N08/2364680828/

Text: http://www.archive.org/details/alicesadventures00carr2